Close Menu
  • Home
  • AI
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Food Health
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • Well Being

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

AI-Written Books Might Be Coming to Your Local Barnes & Noble

May 20, 2026

Two Brothers Raised $12m for an OpenClaw Competitor

May 20, 2026

Cava Is Embracing AI for a Personalized Dining Experience

May 20, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
IQ Times Media – Smart News for a Smarter YouIQ Times Media – Smart News for a Smarter You
  • Home
  • AI
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Food Health
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • Well Being
IQ Times Media – Smart News for a Smarter YouIQ Times Media – Smart News for a Smarter You
Home » Jury deadlocks in trial of Stanford University students after pro-Palestinian protests
Education

Jury deadlocks in trial of Stanford University students after pro-Palestinian protests

IQ TIMES MEDIABy IQ TIMES MEDIAFebruary 13, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A judge declared a mistrial Friday in the case of five current and former Stanford University students charged after pro-Palestinian protests in 2024, when they barricaded themselves inside the university president and provost executive offices.

The jury voted 9 to 3 to convict on a felony charge of vandalism and 8 to 4 to convict on a felony charge of conspiracy to trespass. After deliberating for five days, jurors said they could not reach a verdict.

Judge Hanley Chew asked each one if more time deliberating would help break the impasse, and all answered, “No.”

“It appears that this jury is hopelessly deadlocked, and I’m now declaring a mistrial in counts one and two,” Chen said. He then dismissed the jurors.

Demonstrators barricaded themselves inside the offices for several hours on June 5, 2024, the last day of spring classes at the university.

The trial in Santa Clara County was a rare instance of demonstrators facing felony charges from protests over the Israel-Hamas war that roiled campuses across the country. The two sides argued over free speech, lawful dissent and crime during the three-week trial.

Prosecutors said the defendants spray-painted the building, broke windows and furniture, disabled security cameras and splattered a red liquid described as fake blood on items throughout the offices.

Defense attorneys said the protest was protected speech and there was insufficient evidence of an intent to damage the property. They also said the students wore protective gear and barricaded the offices out of fear of being injured by police and campus security.

If convicted, the defendants would have faced up to three years in prison and been obligated to pay restitution of over $300,000.

Authorities initially arrested and charged 12 people, but one pleaded no contest under an agreement that allows some young people to have their cases dismissed and records sealed if they successfully complete probation.

He testified for the prosecution, leading to a grand jury indictment of the others in October of the others. Six of those accepted pretrial plea deals or diversion programs, and the remaining five pleaded not guilty and sought a jury trial.

Protests sprung up on campuses across the country over the Israel-Hamas conflict, with students setting up camps and demanding their universities stop doing business with Israel or companies that support its war efforts against Hamas.

About 3,200 people were arrested in 2024 nationwide. While some colleges ended demonstrations by striking deals with students or simply waited them out, others called in police. Most criminal charges were ultimately dismissed.

___

This story has been updated to correct the jury counts on the two charges.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
IQ TIMES MEDIA
  • Website

Related Posts

Is new ethics policy for Michigan State trustees a gag order or commonsense loyalty?

May 19, 2026

Opening statements given in trial of ex-Virginia school official charged after student shot teacher

May 19, 2026

Democratic-led states challenge caps on federal student loans

May 19, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Is new ethics policy for Michigan State trustees a gag order or commonsense loyalty?

May 19, 2026

Opening statements given in trial of ex-Virginia school official charged after student shot teacher

May 19, 2026

Democratic-led states challenge caps on federal student loans

May 19, 2026

AI pep talks at college commencements prompt boos from graduates

May 19, 2026
Education

Is new ethics policy for Michigan State trustees a gag order or commonsense loyalty?

By IQ TIMES MEDIAMay 19, 20260

Michigan State University trustees have until this weekend to sign an updated board ethics policy…

Opening statements given in trial of ex-Virginia school official charged after student shot teacher

May 19, 2026

Democratic-led states challenge caps on federal student loans

May 19, 2026

AI pep talks at college commencements prompt boos from graduates

May 19, 2026
IQ Times Media – Smart News for a Smarter You
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 iqtimes. Designed by iqtimes.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.